Goldman Sachs & Market Divide: Focus on the Fed

The financial landscape is continually shaped by an interplay of evolving governmental policies and market expectations. As we prepare to transition into the year 2025, the dialogue surrounding monetary policy and interest rates in the United States is intensifying. Recently, Goldman Sachs published a report that juxtaposes its expectations with those of the broader market regarding the Federal Reserve’s anticipated moves concerning interest rates. This analysis, spearheaded by economist Jan Hatzius and his team, surveyed over 500 market participants to shed light on these critical financial forecasts.

There seems to be a consensus between Goldman Sachs and the market regarding the influence of U.S. immigration policies and fiscal strategies; however, a significant divergence emerges over the Federal Reserve's potential path of interest rate cuts in the coming year. Goldman Sachs predicts that the Federal Reserve will begin a series of interest rate cuts in the first quarter of 2025. This move is expected to occur gradually, culminating in the last two reductions in June and September. Conversely, the surveyed market participants have adopted a more hawkish stance, anticipating aggressive rate cuts earlier than the Goldman Sachs forecast suggests.

Advertisement

Goldman Sachs challenges the market's optimistic outlook on the pace of these cuts. Their reasoning hinges on two pivotal points. Firstly, the firm believes that any new governmental policies are unlikely to trigger the kind of significant inflation that would inhibit the Federal Reserve from lowering interest rates. While it’s true that a reduction in immigration could exert upward pressure on wages and prices in industries that rely heavily on immigrant labor, the overall impact on inflation is expected to be moderate. This is partly because immigrants not only contribute to demand but also to supply in the economy, thus balancing potential price spikes.

In addition, the anticipated fiscal stimulus from the new government seems rather muted, indicating that inflation should remain under control. As for tariffs, Goldman Sachs posits that they would have only a limited, one-time effect on inflation rates. They also emphasize that the rise in inflation is far from dramatic, affording the Federal Reserve room to maneuver in terms of interest rate policy.

The second point raised by Goldman Sachs concerns market assessments of the risks associated with substantial policy shifts. The firm contends that the market underestimates the potential turmoil that a significant policy overhaul could provoke in financial markets. Such turmoil could mirror the "insurance rate cuts" seen in 2019, where the Fed acted decisively in response to economic uncertainties. The firm offers an illustration: a scenario where a 10% tariff could have bifurcated effects on monetary policy—leading to temporary inflation while concurrently slowing economic growth. Refining this approach, during the last round of trade tensions, the Federal Reserve prioritized growth risks, ultimately slashing the federal funds rate by 75 basis points to mitigate these concerns.

Despite these differences, both Goldman Sachs and the surveyed investors align on a few key issues: a subtle reduction in net immigration, the continuation of tax policies, and an increase in tax relief measures. Goldman Sachs anticipates that the new administration will tighten immigration policies. Before the pandemic, the average net immigration in the U.S. hovered around one million per year. This number is projected to decrease to about 750,000 by 2025, representing a modest decline as legal and administrative processes restrict more expansive immigration measures. The Goldman Sachs report reflects this sentiment, with nearly half of the respondents predicting that net immigration could stabilize between 500,000 and one million, paralleling Goldman Sachs’s forecast. Interestingly, even amidst rising media coverage surrounding potential mass deportations, only 6% of respondents expect net immigration levels to turn negative.

As for fiscal policy, there’s a shared expectation among respondents that the tax cuts introduced in 2017 will endure past their scheduled expiration in late 2025. These tax extensions are expected to include the restoration of certain lapsed corporate investment incentives. Furthermore, it is projected that federal spending under the new administration will increase, with personal tax cuts rising to approximately 0.2% of GDP.

The majority of participants expressed optimism that tax relief policies will continue, with around two-thirds anticipating full continuance of these measures, while a third expects partial extensions. Moreover, when it comes to personal tax deductions, a significant majority (around two-thirds) forecasts an increase, although most investors estimate these deductions will remain beneath the $100 billion mark—staying below 0.3% of GDP on an annual basis.

The anticipated efficiency of government spending cuts exhibits considerable variance among investor expectations. Approximately 42% of investors foresee negligible or extremely limited reductions in expenditures, while 19% predict cuts ranging between $25 billion to $100 billion. Meanwhile, 32% of respondents anticipate cuts exceeding $100 billion, equating to more than 0.3% of GDP annually.

The analysis from Goldman Sachs, along with the varied expectations from market participants, underscores a complex and dynamic economic forecasting environment for the United States as it navigates significant policy changes amidst a shifting political landscape. As 2025 approaches, stakeholders will be watching closely how these forecasts unfold and how they will influence both monetary policy and broader financial ecosystems.